Do a simple search for “asteroid” on Google News, and the headlines shout at you.
“NASA warns of 2-mile-wide planet-killer asteroid headed for Earth,” or “…potential impact date in 2022,” or “Asteroid tsunami … could devastate US coast.” And, of course “…monster rock to pass Earth at 17,000 mph.”
Those are just a few of the stories that ran in just the last week, mostly in UK tabloids that really love scary asteroid stories.
If you read past the sensational headlines, you typically find mostly accurate information about an asteroid that’s definitely not going to hit Earth anytime soon. That 2-mile-wide planet killer? It missed us by 1.4 million miles. That’s about 6 miles farther away than the moon. You should literally be more concerned about the moon crashing into your house.
The misleading headlines and stories take advantage of the words scientists use to talk about space objects and the connotations some of those same words have in everyday language.
For example, the phrases “near-earth object” (NEO) and “potentially hazardous asteroid” (PHA) are astronomical terms used to categorize objects with very specific definitions. If an asteroid comes within 4.6 million miles of Earth and has a certain brightness, it makes the list of PHAs. This is really just astronomers’ way of creating a very big catalog of objects worth keeping an eye on. No other evaluation is done of each asteroid to determine just how “potentially hazardous” it is before giving it that designation.
NEOs fall into an even broader category. If you were to leave Earth and travel in the direction of Mars’ orbit around the sun, then stop when you’re about 85 percent of the way to the Red Planet, everything between that position and the sun could technically be considered an NEO.
To non-scientists, it can seem strange to call an asteroid that’s farther away from us than any human has ever traveled “near,” but of course it makes sense when dealing with the mind-blowing scale of the universe, as astronomers do. Same goes for those “potentially hazardous asteroids.” It makes sense to call them that in the context of the hugeness of space, although most PHAs are not actually potential hazards in our lifetimes.
So next time you see a headline screaming about how a “behemoth space rock threatens Earth,” you can check the same sources I do to determine exactly how much you should worry. In fact, I’ll take that specific behemoth as an example.
A few outlets have already begun sounding alarms over the approach of asteroid 2006 SF6, which is set to make a close approach by Earth on Nov. 21. It sure sounds like a risky rock heading our way from some of the headlines, so I’ll check the European Space Agency’s Risk Page.
The ESA maintains a list of “all objects for which a non-zero impact probability has been detected.”
When I click to get the full risk list and search the page for both 2006SF6 and its catalog number, 481394, nothing comes up. This potential planet-pummeller doesn’t appear to have made the list of the 991 most threatening space objects.
Next I check the public database of close approaches maintained by the Center for Near Earth Studies at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. A search brings 2006 SF6 right up. It is indeed a bit of a behemoth, with an estimated diameter of between 919 and 2,690 feet (280 and 820 meters).
This skyscraper-size space rock could do some real damage on impact. But its close-approach distance is listed as 11.23 lunar distances. That’s just what it sounds like: over 11 times farther away than the moon, or about 2.7 million miles (4.3 million kilometers). Sorry, but this behemoth definitely does not threaten Earth.
My point, however, isn’t that you shouldn’t worry about asteroids. As manytell us, the threat of impact by an object from space is very real. But the main threat comes from the objects that aren’t yet in our catalogs.
The most significant impact of the past century happened in 2013 when a, creating a shock wave that shattered thousands of windows. That space rock had not been previously observed before it was exploding in the sky.
The technologies and techniques astronomers use have improved to such a degree that new NEOs are discovered literally every day. This includes some objects actually quite near to Earth, although those tend to be so small they’d probably mostly burn up in the atmosphere if they did impact us, as.
But we still have blind spots, as the 2013 impact demonstrates, so the imperative going forward should be not to freak out over some harmless asteroids, but to devote more resources to continue to scour the sky and complete our catalog so we aren’t caught by surprise again.